- #Alternative to mpeg streamclip mp4
- #Alternative to mpeg streamclip manual
- #Alternative to mpeg streamclip pro
I wished all consumer cameras would record directly to ProRes, because to have heavy compression in the *acquisition* codec is the biggest crime of all. Panasonic is (like Sony) famous for very good compression. But it's 10-bit 422, and if I wanted to use ProRes for editing, I think I rather used ProResHQ then. I really can't tell if it will provide less compression artifacts than the current interframe codec (sodabiscuit12345 mentioned GH3, of which I read reports that All-I mainly made the clips more edit-friendly). Yet I know what you mean - it's still visually indistinguishable.Īnd I'm not sure when the GH5 gets it's 400 mbit All-I codec upgrade. The FS7's XAVC-I for example- 10-bit 422 much more efficiently compressed - gets transcoded to ProRes422 at almost identical data rates. ProRes is 10-bit and certainly a great deal better as a codec than the original H.264.ĭepends. I'd still import into the library, and I'd still tag within FCP, because everything just works more fluidly there.
![alternative to mpeg streamclip alternative to mpeg streamclip](https://momsretpa.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/5/5/125522662/744461482.png)
![alternative to mpeg streamclip alternative to mpeg streamclip](https://images.sftcdn.net/images/t_app-logo-l,f_auto/p/1874367a-9b35-11e6-add2-00163ed833e7/1632502434/mpeg-streamclip-beta-logo.png)
It's still little else than my reasons to buy Kyno to get rid of some arbitrary limitations. This is no rant against FCP, though it may sound so. Many asked why they couldn't choose ProResLT (enough for GoPro HD in most cases) or higher bitrates for multiple generations of compositing and grading in different programs, but they are answered, if it's good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for you. If you send a project to other apps, FCP again links to the originals, and if you prefer this kind of definite intermediate, you have to workaround this fact. You can't switch to Original Media unless you delete the Optimized Media. Nevertheless FCP uses only ProRes422 once it's available. It's NOT optmized for optimal quality for every resolution, bit depth or degree of post, it's optimized for comfortable editing and a good compromise of real time and visually lossless monitoring. You can't choose any flavor of ProRes, it automatically is the medium quality ProRes422. The no part is that it's not confined to the favorite selection, but does the whole clip. You can select the clips, right-click and select Transcode Media. I recently tried several trimming utilities but didn't find anything as simple and elegant as MPEG Streamclip.Yes and no. And MPEG Streamclip losslessly trims to the GOP while QuickTime Player re-encodes material outsides GOPs (material inside GOPs seems to be saved losslessly). Yes, QuickTime Player can also quite nicely do that but it shows frames as decimals while MPEG Streamclip more accurately displays them as frames so fine-tuning the trim is easier.
#Alternative to mpeg streamclip pro
I still prefer MPEG Streamclip to losslessly trim large movies (from DJI Phantom 3 Pro etc) before archiving them.
#Alternative to mpeg streamclip manual
The most severe artifacts can be fixed via Get Info > Open in low Resolution but even then it can't automatically resize the viewer and manual resizing is needed. MPEG Streamclip has not been updated in ages and it has some cosmetic visual artifacts in Mojave.
#Alternative to mpeg streamclip mp4
I used MPEG Streamclip to convert all my iPad-incompatible old movies to H.264 mp4 over a year ago. Mojave could also be virtualized but there are GUI artifacts (in Finder and Safari tabs etc) because there is no graphics acceleration (i.e. The documents can be on the Catalina's Desktop or some other shared folder and edited from the virtual machine. El Capitan virtualized via VMware Fusion seems to run old 32-bit apps (MPEG Streamclip, Lightroom 6.14, Photoshop CS6 etc) in Catalina in light use OK.